Written by Nick T.
May 10, 2010
Ladies and Gentleman,
After two weeks of being on time, I'm showing up late again. This week's delayed edition is due much in part to Nick Swisher and Jorge Posada; between the two of them, I almost had a heart attack last night. The day was going perfect...Dallas Braden makes history (did you know he never even threw a CG til yesterday?!) and Team Euro was on pace to go 3-2 after a tough loss in week 4. Even with Oliver Perez two start stats (9.1 INN, 8 HA, 11 BBI, 6 K, 5 ER), I was still feeling good leading into Ervin Santana's start...he allowed five runs on 10 hits in 6 2/3 innings, issuing three walks and recording five strikeouts...with this performance, my margin was between heart failure and champagne (a lowly extra base hit on my opponents end). Below is the man that took care of business and solidified my win in the 4th inning of last night's 'Greatest Rivalry in Sports' (is anyone else SICK of that?).
Lets not forget that including the homer, he went 2 for 4 in Boston, his fifth HR in eight games. He's batting .438 (14 for 32) during that stretch....BEAST! Posada on the other hand...not so much. Does anyone else find it ironic that Posada pushed out Girardi as he entered the league and not it's Girardi pushing out Posada as a manager?
Nationals did not do us in this week and we're on the good side of .500. Maybe it's because I dropped Pudge for Yadier's week 5 stats: 11-22, 3 2B, 7 RBI, 2 R, 2 SB, 3 BB, KO
...or maybe its because we made the right decision by benching Sizemore (5-21, 2B, RBI, 3 R, 2 BB, 6 KO) for Konerko (3-18, 2B, HR, 3 RBI, 4 R, 4 BB, 5 KO) or was it because of HIM:
Yes, that is JAKE PEAVY who did this in week 5: 15 INN, 7 HA, BBI, 17 K, 2 ER, 2 W which equaled the most fantasy points by a PLAYER in our league last week!
Double Duty Pitching = Way of Life!
In a week where there are teams with only 5 games and limited doubt duty action, I made the following moves:
MY WEEK
HIS WEEK
So Far...
He has the following production from V-Mart in the Top of the 2nd: 1-1, 2 RBI
In closing, I'd like to leave you with the following link...before I share, I'd like to show you this photo and say PHILLY IS WHAT YOU THOUGHT THEY WERE!
Myers, Brett SP HOU - Added
Perez, Oliver SP NYM - Dropped
LeBlanc, Wade SP SD - Added
Rodney, Fernando RP ANA - Dropped
Looking ahead...
With the week Yadier had last week, we see him back in the lineup in week 6. Konerko was moved to the bench for Sizemore based SOLELY on the White Sox only playing 5 this week. The same partially explains the move for benching Rauch; Bailey's week 5 stats explain the rest: 3.1 INN, HA, 3 S. LeBlanc and Myers get the nod because they have 2 a piece and Peavy gets respect!
Here's what we got in going on in week 6:
MY WEEK
Molina, Yadier C STL
Morneau, Justin 1B MIN
Prado, Martin 2B ATL
Zimmerman, Ryan 3B WAS
Bartlett, Jason SS TB
Ethier, Andre RF LA
Span, Denard CF MIN
Swisher, Nick RF NYY
Sizemore, Grady CF CLE
Bailey, Andrew RP OAK
Fuentes, Brian RP ANA
LeBlanc, Wade SP SD
Myers, Brett SP HOU
Nolasco, Ricky SP FLA
Peavy, Jake SP CHW
Wainwright, Adam SP STL
HIS WEEK
Martinez, Victor C BOS
Berkman, Lance 1B HOU
Kendrick, Howard 2B ANA
Sandoval, Pablo 3B SF
Drew, Stephen SS ARI
Holliday, Matt LF STL
Jones, Adam CF BAL
Werth, Jayson RF PHI
Escobar, Alcides SS MIL
Broxton, Jonathan RP LA
Chacin, Jhoulys RP COL
Hernandez, Livan SP WAS
Johnson, Josh SP FLA
Lester, Jon SP BOS
Niese, Jonathon SP NYM
Soriano, Rafael RP TB
So Far...
He has the following production from V-Mart in the Top of the 2nd: 1-1, 2 RBI
I have a walk from Swish and Zim is 0-1
Lets go Brett Myers! (you've already been dropped)
Finally, some random ramblings and findings from the week...
Big Brother IS Watching! I recently deleted my facebook account and haven't looked back until my decision was reaffirmed by the article below:
After some reflection, I've decided to delete my account on Facebook. I'd like to encourage you to do the same. This is part altruism and part selfish. The altruism part is that I think Facebook, as a company, is unethical. The selfish part is that I'd like my own social network to migrate away from Facebook so that I'm not missing anything. In any event, here's my "Top Ten" reasons for why you should join me and many others and delete your account.
10. Facebook's Terms Of Service are completely one-sided. Let's start with the basics. Facebook's Terms Of Service state that not only do they own your data (section 2.1), but if you don't keep it up to date and accurate (section 4.6), they can terminate your account (section 14). You could argue that the terms are just protecting Facebook's interests, and are not in practice enforced, but in the context of their other activities, this defense is pretty weak. As you'll see, there's no reason to give them the benefit of the doubt. Essentially, they see their customers as unpaid employees for crowd-sourcing ad-targeting data.
9. Facebook's CEO has a documented history of unethical behavior. From the very beginning of Facebook's existence, there are questions about Zuckerberg's ethics. According to BusinessInsider.com, he used Facebook user data to guess email passwords and read personal email in order to discredit his rivals. These allegations, albeit unproven and somewhat dated, nonetheless raise troubling questions about the ethics of the CEO of the world's largest social network. They're particularly compelling given that Facebook chose to fork over $65M to settle a related lawsuit alleging that Zuckerberg had actually stolen the idea for Facebook.
8. Facebook has flat out declared war on privacy. Founder and CEO of Facebook, in defense of Facebook's privacy changes last January: "People have really gotten comfortable not only sharing more information and different kinds, but more openly and with more people. That social norm is just something that has evolved over time." More recently, in introducing the Open Graph API: "... the default is now social." Essentially, this means Facebook not only wants to know everything about you, and own that data, but to make it available to everybody. Which would not, by itself, necessarily be unethical, except that ...
7. Facebook is pulling a classic bait-and-switch. At the same time that they're telling developers how to access your data with new APIs, they are relatively quiet about explaining the implications of that to members. What this amounts to is a bait-and-switch. Facebook gets you to share information that you might not otherwise share, and then they make it publicly available. Since they are in the business of monetizing information about you for advertising purposes, this amounts to tricking their users into giving advertisers information about themselves. This is why Facebook is so much worse than Twitter in this regard: Twitter has made only the simplest (and thus, more credible) privacy claims and their customers know up front that all their tweets are public. It's also why the FTC is getting involved, and people are suing them (and winning).
Update: Check out this excellent timeline from the EFF documenting the changes to Facebook's privacy policy.
6. Facebook is a bully. When Pete Warden demonstrated just how this bait-and-switch works (by crawling all the data that Facebook's privacy settings changes had inadvertently made public) they sued him. Keep in mind, this happened just before they announced the Open Graph API and stated that the "default is now social." So why sue an independent software developer and fledgling entrepreneur for making data publicly available when you're actually already planning to do that yourself? Their real agenda is pretty clear: they don't want their membership to know how much data is really available. It's one thing to talk to developers about how great all this sharing is going to be; quite another to actually see what that means in the form of files anyone can download and load into MatLab.
5. Even your private data is shared with applications. At this point, all your data is shared with applications that you install. Which means now you're not only trusting Facebook, but the application developers, too, many of whom are too small to worry much about keeping your data secure. And some of whom might be even more ethically challenged than Facebook. In practice, what this means is that all your data - all of it - must be effectively considered public, unless you simply never use any Facebook applications at all. Coupled with the OpenGraph API, you are no longer trusting Facebook, but the Facebook ecosystem.
4. Facebook is not technically competent enough to be trusted. Even if we weren't talking about ethical issues here, I can't trust Facebook's technical competence to make sure my data isn't hijacked. For example, their recent introduction of their "Like" button makes it rather easy for spammers to gain access to my feed and spam my social network. Or how about this gem for harvesting profile data? These are just the latest of a series of Keystone Kops mistakes, such as accidentally making users' profiles completely public, or the cross-site scripting hole that took them over two weeks to fix. They either don't care too much about your privacy or don't really have very good engineers, or perhaps both.
3. Facebook makes it incredibly difficult to truly delete your account. It's one thing to make data public or even mislead users about doing so; but where I really draw the line is that, once you decide you've had enough, it's pretty tricky to really delete your account. They make no promises about deleting your data and every application you've used may keep it as well. On top of that, account deletion is incredibly (and intentionally) confusing. When you go to your account settings, you're given an option to deactivate your account, which turns out not to be the same thing as deleting it. Deactivating means you can still be tagged in photos and be spammed by Facebook (you actually have to opt out of getting emails as part of the deactivation, an incredibly easy detail to overlook, since you think you're deleting your account). Finally, the moment you log back in, you're back like nothing ever happened! In fact, it's really not much different from not logging in for awhile. To actually delete your account, you have to find a link buried in the on-line help (by "buried" I mean it takes five clicks to get there). Or you can just click here. Basically, Facebook is trying to trick their users into allowing them to keep their data even after they've "deleted" their account.
2. Facebook doesn't (really) support the Open Web. The so-called Open Graph API is named so as to disguise its fundamentally closed nature. It's bad enough that the idea here is that we all pitch in and make it easier than ever to help Facebook collect more data about you. It's bad enough that most consumers will have no idea that this data is basically public. It's bad enough that they claim to own this data and are aiming to be the one source for accessing it. But then they are disingenuous enough to call it "open," when, in fact, it is completely proprietary to Facebook. You can't use this feature unless you're on Facebook. A truly open implementation would work with whichever social network we prefer, and it would look something like OpenLike. Similarly, they implement just enough of OpenID to claim they support it, while aggressively promoting a proprietary alternative, Facebook Connect.
1. The Facebook application itself sucks. Between the farms and the mafia wars and the "top news" (which always guesses wrong - is that configurable somehow?) and the myriad privacy settings and the annoying ads (with all that data about me, the best they can apparently do is promote dating sites, because, uh, I'm single) and the thousands upon thousands of crappy applications, Facebook is almost completely useless to me at this point. Yes, I could probably customize it better, but the navigation is ridiculous, so I don't bother. (And, yet, somehow, I can't even change colors or apply themes or do anything to make my page look personalized.) Let's not even get into how slowly your feed page loads. Basically, at this point, Facebook is more annoying than anything else.
Facebook is clearly determined to add every feature of every competing social network in an attempt to take over the Web (this is a never-ending quest that goes back to AOL and those damn CDs that were practically falling out of the sky). While Twitter isn't the most usable thing in the world, at least they've tried to stay focused and aren't trying to be everything to everyone.
I often hear people talking about Facebook as though they were some sort of monopoly or public trust. Well, they aren't. They owe us nothing. They can do whatever they want, within the bounds of the laws. (And keep in mind, even those criteria are pretty murky when it comes to social networking.) But that doesn't mean we have to actually put up with them. Furthermore, their long-term success is by no means guaranteed - have we all forgotten MySpace? Oh, right, we have. Regardless of the hype, the fact remains that Sergei Brin or Bill Gates or Warren Buffett could personally acquire a majority stake in Facebook without even straining their bank account. And Facebook's revenue remains more or less a rounding error for more established tech companies.
While social networking is a fun new application category enjoying remarkable growth, Facebook isn't the only game in town. I don't like their application nor how they do business and so I've made my choice to use other providers. And so can you.
In closing, I'd like to leave you with the following link...before I share, I'd like to show you this photo and say PHILLY IS WHAT YOU THOUGHT THEY WERE!
http://www.foxnews.com/sports/2010/05/04/phillies-fan-tasered-running-field/?test=latestnews
NT
Take that City of Brotherly Love! See you next week!
NT
NT@BTFFS.com
You can visit the latest column directly by visiting BTFFS.com
You can visit the latest column directly by visiting BTFFS.com
THE League, g.fantasy: GFANTASY.com
Going into week 6, we're 3-2. Chuck and pray!
Next Issue (1.10): 10th issue!
Next Issue (1.10): 10th issue!